Actually that’s not too surprising
So here ya go: In, America, there's this thing, called the Healthy People plan, that outlines goals for the country for "Healthiness" and whatnot. The current plan was just reviewed, and... well, it wasn't too pretty.

I tried to tell my doctor that, but she didn't believe me.
Did Americans get any healthier over past decade?. [link to PhysOrg.com]
Am I writing about this because of the raging obesity epidemic in America?
...no, of course not.
I'm writing this to say: "NO SHIT, SHERLOCK. AMERICA IS A GODDAMNED CAPITALIST COUNTRY AND FOOD IS A ECONOMIC LINCHPIN. THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER THIS CRAP."
Logically speaking, of course.
I mean, think about it. Capitalist country, run by it's economy, and the government tries to step in all lovey dovey, all outline a plan of "helpful" things to encourage people to live better.
News flash for that one, boyo: The Almighty Dollar runs capitalist nations, not the Almighty Bureaucrat. If letting people remain unhealthy is profitable, it will happen. If not giving a shit is profitable, it will happen. If crime is profitable, it will happen. If Death and Decay is profitable, it will happen.
Hopefully you have the glyph for it.
Until making people healthy becomes profitable, it won't happen. But to do so from a legislative standpoint would be to overstep the boundaries of government. Hell, just deciding that this is what you think is best for the American public, and then actually making laws to support your own agenda is overstepping the boundaries.

Premium Fue, then staying the garage all the time? Bad mix, brah.
So what's the better plan? Well, weight is gained when calories consumed is greater than calories burned. Keep that in mind.
Right now, we live in a society where we are expected to work very long hours with little purpose. People put in 9 hour days, but they really only have enough work for maybe half that time. But if you were to do all of your work in that amount of time, and then say, go home (if the boss was cool) they would only pay you half the amount, since you only worked half the hours.
Translation: You're not getting paid for the work you accomplish, or the job you do. You're getting paid based on how many hours of your life are spent on location. In a sort of hopeful spin, I assume part of the reason you have to stick around even though your workload doesn't justify it, is because of expectation that something might happen, and the company doesn't want to be shorthanded. Okay.
Right right. Easy stuff.
Well, that's a number of hours off your day. Now toss in commute time and logistics. Pretty much everything in America requires a car to get to. So now we have car related things to add to the time sink... And I'm sure you can see where I'm going with that. Point is, from my experience, working a 9 hour daily job, usually ends up taking around 11-12 hours a day.
But... The thing is, even though I'm running around a lot, and I'm stressed, and so much of my life is just ticking down...

...And as you sit it traffic, it all catches up with you.
...I'm not actually doing that much. I'm sitting in traffic, or I'm walking around a store, or I'm sitting at a desk for god knows how many hours. Not enough calories are getting burned to justify my diet.
My diet that is based on the cornerstone of Capitalism. Cheaper foods are worse for you. They're highly processed, with crap tons of things that the average person can't pronounce. The have no real content, just filler, because the filler that makes the food is itself cheap: See also Corn Meal. And I, like most people, have other things I need to buy, so I cut corners here and there. And as long as I'm sitting on my ass for most of the day to get the paycheck that can only pay for the cheapest food, I'm going to be unhealthy, because IT'S ALL I CAN AFFORD.
In terms of money, and in terms of time.
You want to encourage people to get healthy, you need to change the system so that people actually have the ability to do so. If I can finish my workload for the week in two days, then let me do so, then pay me for a full week. That way I can spend time doing other more enjoyable things, or get another job so I can finally afford fruits and vegetables.
Otherwise, you're just making all of us feel like crap by telling us that we need to get healthy when we have no money or time or opportunity to actually do anything about it.
------------
[As a side note to this: When I was in high school, I lost 180 lbs in a year, by biking every day and eating a good diet. I was also homeschooled at the time. I'm completely capable of doing that sort of thing again, but I can't, and that's why I realize that it comes down to a time and money issue. I lost weight back then because I didn't have any time obligations, and my mom bought all my food. Now, I have to work, and I have to buy my food, and I understand why my mom is overweight.]
January 4th, 2010 - 11:29
People need to stop caring about the health of complete strangers. Unless a person works in an environment where the health of the person next to them directly influences their job (police,firemen,military) then who cares. One thing I do disagree with though is that the cheap food causing people to get fat rule you pointed out has one exception, ramen. You eat ramen noodles for two weeks straight you’ll lose weight guaranteed.
January 5th, 2010 - 20:43
Dude, Ramen noodles aren’t that cheap. At least in my area. Costs about 2.50 for a commercial plastic bowl/bottle thing, the same as a turkey or ham sub (about 6 or 8 inches, absolutely shitty quality, but they include a packet of mayonnaise, so there’s no need to actually taste any of it). I’ve never ordered the cheeseburger or hamburger, but I think its a buck.50 or 2 bucks, the same as a somewhat large slice of cardboard-flavored pizza. Slushees, water bottles, soda cans, chip bags, those are all a buck. Yeah, there’s a lot of other, cheaper shit out there than Ramen.