Tag Archive for rant

I think I missed something there…

Okay… so there’s this JC Penney commercial wandering about the webs… and people have called it sexist. Okay, fine.

“ZOMG!! It relies on horrible sterotypes!! It’s SEXIST OMG!!!”

Yeah, I can sorta see where you’re coming from. It portrays men as not really giving a damn about anything but boobies and butts… But even so it is a kinda-

Wait. What?

What do you mean, it’s sexist towards women?

From there, I just wandered around the net a bit, and most of the articles about it were level headed and downcrying the OneMillionMoms response, but there were still a good portion who also claimed the sexist slant, either siding with OneMillionMoms, or disagreeing with their response yet agreeing with their conclusion. Few were seeing it as using negative stereotypes about men. But, even amongst those few, the general response was “It’s only insulting to men, and sexist to women.”

So… Uh… I think I missed something here. Maybe the definition of sexist has changed so it can only be applied to things that are insulting to women? Even when… the women part of it doesn’t have anything to do with implications or what have you? Just so long as it offends women, its sexist?

See, if there was a label on it that was like “ALL WOMEN CARE ABOUT IT GETTING IN AND OUT OF POOLS WHILE WEARING RED BIKINIS, BECAUSE WOMEN ARE SHALLOW”… See, then I could understand the argument of sexism. But when its playing a clip, from a movie,… not so much. It doesn’t make any statements about women. It just shows a girl getting getting out of a pool. And then assumes that a man will be beside himself going “OMG BOOBIES!!”

So… its objectifying a woman? Okay… maybe…? But… that argument is… kinda vague. If she got out of the pool, turned the camera and said “You want this? Shop at JC Penney” then okay, I can agree. But… as it is… if that is objectifying women… then sunscreen commercials are objectifying women, too. …And beer commercials… And summer vacation commercials, airline commercials, and anything else with attractive women in bikinis… so… what then? No bikinis… But technically, any commercial that uses a woman as an avatar for female consumers is also objectifying women. And from there…

Well,… eventually it all leads to hyper intelligent chimpanzees ruling the world.

So… what? Women aren’t allowed to get out of pools? Or is it a video of a woman getting out a pool shouldn’t be used in a commercial? Or is it that because the commercial was promoted to men it isn’t allowed to show women? Or is it just that OneMillionMoms has a bug up its ass and is pandering to ridiculous things just to keep their name in the news?

Sure, a lot of advertising does objectify women. And some of that is really, really bad, offensive stuff. But when you blur the lines between what actually is objectification, and what’s just tasteless… then you end up undermining the the significance of objectification, and turn it into just another mildly annoying condition of commercialism.

 

————— OTHER NEWS —————-

Uh… I’m building a framework for my first game? Yay? Still haven’t figured out what I’ll do for Audio yet, though.

 

Running Blind

Oh God, what have I stumbled into?

Alright, so, I started with Java. I ended up vaguely, mildly skilled with it, but Java was always intended as being a stepping stone to something else… So once I got confident with Java, I started poking around looking for the next stone up, and the options were Server-side skills, Desktop Applications, or Mobile App Dev.

Server-side looked like it needed a lot more time until it became profitable. So… Bleh. Still, it would be useful for the site… buuuttt… I needed money ASAP, so that option went into long term storage.

Desktop Applications, though, looked like it might have some payoff, so… Cool. I started down that one for a bit, but uh… the problem with it is that most of the references/answers/solutions/whatever were all written several years ago, and to get through to the current stuff, you have to really dig, you know? So it got pretty frustrating pretty fast. No worries though. But then, I start looking around for jobs in Java… and… well, honestly, it’s a shitstorm. Pretty much all of the jobs for Java development have absolutely dick-all to do with Java. Instead, it’s like, they’re looking for a webdesigner to do their website, but since the last guy who applied had this “javascript” thing (whatever that is) on his resume… well, let’s look for a javascript person… and the site that we’re advertising on has a job title that says “Java Developer” and that’s like… really close to this javascript thing… they must be the same thing!!

You get the idea.

Okay so, Mobile App Development!

Yay! Let’s see, how can I use my newly acquired Java skills in the mobile enviro- *Reads Internet Articles* Oh! Hey! ANDROID!! Android uses Java! Sweet!! Let’s go do that!!

And then there was bunnies and rainbows and bubbles and unicorns.

…Oh wait, no there wasn’t. Because Android doesn’t actually use Java.

F You, Internet. F. You.

See, Android uses the Java syntax and structure… but that’s about it. So, switching from Java to Android isn’t like going from San Francisco to New York, where there’s just a few new things to pick up, but it’s still the same language.

No, it’s more like making the move from San Francisco to Barcelona. It’s like… the only similarities here in language are that they still use nouns and verbs.

Okay, that’s a little extreme. To put it another way, Android is still using the same structure and everything, but since the underlying methods and objects are different, it’s like having to learn that this thing, this hotdog that you’ve known all your life as a hotdog is now to be known as a CylindricalMeatProduct. And while it has all the same behaviors as a hotdog, they’re all named differently.

Way to make me feel like an idiot, Google.

For anyone who has worked with android:
Quick! How do I put text on a button?!? (The Android way, not the Java way)

Exactly.

On top of that though, Android has got a little storm on the horizon, particularly with App development progressively becoming more and more complicated as more handsets hit the market. I’ll probably end up writing more about that later though.

Honestly though, it’s starting to seem like getting into Android dev was a waste of time.

THQ vs The World 2011!!

Short Explanation:  THQ has decided to use a “one time code for online play” for Smackdown vs. Raw 2011.  A lot of people go insane.  Especially people who prefer used games.  THQ then stands up for its decision and says “Hey, we don’t really care about people that buy the game used because it doesn’t profit us.”

Yeah, those guys.

Yeah, those guys.

So there’s two main camps here: Those that say what THQ is doing is unfair, and those who say it’s understandable.

So I’m going to tackle a few of the popular arguments of both sides, just because.

Read more